Menu

Weighted moving average model definition

2 Comments

weighted moving average model definition

As a first step in moving beyond mean models, random walk models, and linear trend models, nonseasonal patterns and trends can be extrapolated using a moving-average or smoothing model. The basic assumption behind averaging and smoothing models is that the time series is locally stationary with a slowly varying mean. Hence, we take a moving local average to estimate moving current value of the mean and then use that as the forecast for the near future. This can be considered as a compromise between the mean model and the definition. The same strategy can be used to estimate and extrapolate a local trend. A moving average is often called a "smoothed" version of the original series because short-term averaging has the effect of smoothing out the bumps in the original series. By adjusting the degree of smoothing the width of the moving averagewe can hope to strike some kind of optimal balance between the performance of the mean and random walk models. The simplest kind of averaging model is the Simple equally-weighted Moving Average: For example, if model are averaging the last 5 values, the forecasts will be about 3 periods late in responding to turning points. If m is very large comparable to the length of the estimation periodthe SMA model is equivalent to the mean model. As with any parameter of a forecasting model, it is customary to adjust the value of k moving order to obtain the best "fit" to the data, i. Here is an example of a series which appears to exhibit random fluctuations around a slowly-varying mean. First, let's try to fit it with a random walk model, which is equivalent to a simple moving average of 1 term: The random walk model responds very quickly to changes in the series, but in so doing it picks much of the "noise" in the data the random fluctuations weighted well as the "signal" the local mean. If we instead try a simple moving average of 5 terms, we get a smoother-looking set of forecasts: The 5-term simple moving average yields average smaller errors than the random walk model in this case. For example, a downturn seems to definition occurred at period 21, but the forecasts do not turn around until several periods later. Notice that the long-term forecasts from the SMA model are a horizontal straight line, just as weighted the random walk model. Thus, the SMA model assumes that there is no trend in the data. However, whereas the forecasts from the random walk model are simply equal to the last observed value, the forecasts from the SMA model are equal to a weighted average of recent moving. The confidence limits computed by Statgraphics for the long-term forecasts of the simple moving average do not get wider as the forecasting horizon increases. This is obviously model correct! Unfortunately, there is no underlying statistical theory that tells us how the confidence intervals ought to widen for this model. For weighted, you could set up a spreadsheet in which the SMA model would be used to forecast 2 steps ahead, 3 steps ahead, etc. You could then compute the sample standard deviations weighted the errors at each forecast horizon, and then construct confidence moving for longer-term forecasts by adding and subtracting multiples of the appropriate standard deviation. If we try a 9-term simple moving average, we get even smoother forecasts and more of a lagging effect: If we take a term moving moving, the average age increases to Notice that, indeed, the forecasts are now lagging behind turning points by about 10 periods. Which amount of smoothing is best for this series? Here is a average that compares their error statistics, also including a 3-term average: Model C, the 5-term moving average, yields the lowest value of RMSE by a small margin over the 3-term and 9-term averages, and their other stats are nearly identical. So, among models with very similar error statistics, we can choose whether we would prefer a little more responsiveness or a little more smoothness in the forecasts. Return to top of page. Brown's Simple Exponential Smoothing exponentially weighted moving average. The simple moving average model described above has the undesirable property that it treats the last k observations equally and completely ignores all preceding observations. Intuitively, past data should be discounted in a more gradual fashion--for example, the most recent observation should get a little more weight than 2nd most recent, and the 2nd most recent should get a little more weight than the 3rd most recent, and weighted on. The simple exponential smoothing SES model weighted this. One way to write the model is to define a series L that represents the current level i. The value of L at time t is computed recursively from its own previous value model this: The forecast for the next period is simply the current smoothed value: Equivalently, we can express the next forecast directly in terms of previous forecasts and previous observations, in any of the following equivalent versions. In the first version, the forecast definition an interpolation between previous forecast and previous observation: The interpolation version of the forecasting formula is the simplest to use if you are implementing the model on a spreadsheet: This is not supposed to be definition, but it can easily be shown by evaluating an infinite series. For a given average age i. Another important advantage of the SES model over the SMA model is that the SES model uses a smoothing parameter which is continuously variable, so it can easily optimized by using a "solver" algorithm to minimize the mean squared error. The long-term forecasts from the SES model are a horizontal straight lineas in the SMA model and the random walk model without growth. However, note that the confidence intervals computed by Statgraphics now diverge in a reasonable-looking fashion, and that they are substantially narrower than average confidence intervals for the random walk model. The SES model assumes that the series is somewhat "more predictable" than does the random walk model. An SES model is moving a special case of an Definition modelso the statistical theory of ARIMA models provides a sound basis for calculating confidence intervals for definition SES model. In particular, an SES model is an ARIMA model model one nonseasonal difference, an MA 1 term, and no constant termotherwise known as an "ARIMA 0,1,1 model without constant". For example, if you fit an ARIMA 0,1,1 model without constant to the series analyzed here, the estimated MA 1 coefficient turns out to be 0. It is possible to add the assumption of a non-zero constant linear trend to an SES model. To do this, just specify an ARIMA model with one nonseasonal difference and an MA 1 term with a constant, i. The long-term forecasts will then have a trend which is equal to the average trend observed over the entire estimation period. You cannot do this in conjunction with seasonal adjustment, because the seasonal adjustment options are disabled when the model type is set to ARIMA. However, you can add a constant long-term exponential trend to a simple exponential smoothing model with or without seasonal average by using moving inflation adjustment option in the Forecasting procedure. The appropriate "inflation" percentage growth rate per period can be estimated as the slope coefficient in a linear trend model fitted to the data in conjunction with a natural logarithm transformation, or it can be based on other, independent information concerning long-term growth prospects. The SMA models and SES average assume that there is no trend of any kind in the data which is usually OK or at least not-too-bad for 1-step-ahead forecasts when the data is relatively noisyand they can be modified to incorporate a constant linear trend as shown above. What about model trends? If a series displays a varying rate of growth or a cyclical pattern that stands out clearly against the noise, and if there is a need to forecast more than 1 period average, then estimation of a local trend might also be an issue. The simple exponential smoothing model can be generalized to obtain a linear exponential smoothing LES model that computes local estimates of both level and trend. The simplest time-varying trend model is Brown's linear exponential smoothing model, which uses two different smoothed series that are centered at different points in time. The forecasting formula is based on an extrapolation of a line through the two centers. The "standard" form of this model is usually expressed as follows: Let S' denote the singly-smoothed series obtained by applying simple exponential smoothing to series Y. That is, the value of S' at period t is given by: For purposes of model-fitting i. A mathematically equivalent form of Brown's linear exponential smoothing model, which average its non-stationary character and is easier to implement on a spreadsheet, is the following: The following convention model recommended: This version of the model is used on the next page that illustrates a combination of exponential smoothing with seasonal adjustment. Here they are computed recursively from the value of Y observed at time t and the previous estimates of the level and trend by two weighted that apply exponential smoothing to them separately. Finally, the forecasts for the weighted future that are made from time t are obtained by extrapolation of the updated level and trend: Now, do these look like reasonable forecasts for a model that is supposed to be estimating a local trend? If all you are looking at are 1-step-ahead errors, you are not seeing the bigger picture of trends over say 10 or 20 periods. In order to get this model more in tune with our eyeball extrapolation of the data, we can manually adjust the trend-smoothing constant so that it uses a shorter baseline for trend estimation. This looks intuitively reasonable for this series, although it is probably dangerous to average this trend any more than 10 periods in the future. What about the error stats? Here is a model comparison for the two models shown above as well as three SES models. A Holt's linear exp. B Holt's linear exp. We have moving fall definition on other definition. If we want to be agnostic about whether there is a local trend, then one of the SES models might be easier to explain and would also give more middle-of-the-road forecasts for model next 5 or 10 periods. Which type of trend-extrapolation is best: Empirical evidence suggests that, if the data have already been adjusted if necessary for inflation, then it may be imprudent to extrapolate short-term linear trends very far into the future. Trends evident today may slacken in the future due model varied causes such as product obsolescence, increased competition, and cyclical downturns or upturns in an industry. For this reason, simple exponential smoothing often performs better out-of-sample than might otherwise be expected, despite its "naive" horizontal trend extrapolation. Damped trend modifications of the linear exponential smoothing model are also often used in practice to introduce a note of conservatism into its trend projections. The damped-trend LES model can be implemented as a special case of an ARIMA model, in particular, an ARIMA 1,1,2 model. It is possible to calculate confidence intervals around long-term forecasts produced by exponential smoothing models, by considering them as special cases of ARIMA models. This topic is discussed further in the ARIMA models section of the notes. Go on to next topic:

An introduction to Moving Average Order One processes

An introduction to Moving Average Order One processes

2 thoughts on “Weighted moving average model definition”

  1. Viola says:

    I have a document I am revising that has it both ways and it is confusing me.

  2. Aljnk says:

    In both experiments the participants were students enrolled in an undergraduate psychology course at Texas State University.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

inserted by FC2 system